C.I.A. RANT
I had an economic article all ready, and surprisingly it wasn't even really about the current collapse. I was going to explore the idea that the last thirty years were little more than digitalizing our old analog economy as the bulk of our production. For instance, military spending and advancement mostly being chipping everything and decentralizing communications. Or the replacement of people with "robots". Perhaps I'll still do that next week. No, it doesn't have a lot to do with preps other than understanding economics. Well, a loyal minion wrote and suggested an Obammy attack and it kind of got sucked into my brain and wouldn't leave. This falls under the mostly improbable but wouldn't it be cool if it were true category. And, no, this has almost nothing to do with preps either, other than relating to politics. At least it is a little something different.
*
You know, I know and Ross Perot knows that the official version of the JFK assassination has more huge gaping holes in it than a prison bitch. Oliver Stone's movie was a bit of disinformation, trying to deflect attention from the true culprits by blaming the military industrial complex because of a threat to the slow down in the Vietnam war. This makes absolutely no sense because the Cold War spending was sufficient to satisfy that group. Vietnam was just gravy, and even the greediest would agree you can't prolong a hot war too long or you damage the economy which kills military spending altogether. No, the real culprits were the Federal Reserve Bank ( in my humble opinion, anyway ). However, the movie did do a great job pointing out the many flaws in the official explanation. The Magic Bullet Theory. We will never know the details. We don't know if the CIA was involved because of the Bay Of Pigs. Or if the mafia was involved because of voting fraud. Hell, I'm sure Marilyn Monroe was involved somehow or another. Those details are not s important as who benefited the most. That is why my vote is with the central bank. JFK had tried to get back control of currency issuance. Tens of billions of dollars a year ( now hundreds ) in interest payments on the national debt is a powerful incentive to do away with anyone threatening that payment.
*
The new theory is that while before the CIA was ridding itself of the JFK threat, today it is concerned with the threat of exposure over the waterboarding torture issue. Obammy gets uppity over that, goes to Mexico on a "I'm a pretty boy and must tour the world calming fears that we are all going to die" visit, and the aerosol Swine Flu is sprayed around trying to infect him. Sure, it sounds crazy and convoluted, but remember that the CIA tried to get Fidel with an exploding cigar. Other times they tried to get his beard to fall out. And we wonder why the Bay Of Pigs didn't work. It isn't any crazier of a theory than any other. If you were the director of a huge intelligence service and were suddenly faced with prison time of position loss, is it so crazy to assume you wouldn't use your wet operatives to neutralize the threat? The KGB made "heart attacks" happen all the time to Premiers.
*
You might think that the CIA is little more than a large inefficient bureaucracy. And mostly you might be correct. But surely, throwing hundreds of billions at the problem might get some results. Plus, let's not forget most folks seem to think the drug trade is used by the CIA for off the books budget money. The untraced cash they have access to surely funds a lot of activity we don't know about. Who else could have infiltrated all of the militia groups in the '90's? I don't think the FBI had the manpower, being more of a quality than a quantity organization. The President makes noises about budget cutting at the end of the Cold War, but if all along they had an illegal undercover operation than they would have felt no danger of obsolescence. And what if it was the CIA rather than the ATF behind the OKC bombing? That sounds a lot more plausible to me than any other group.
*
So, any other reason the CIA would try to off Obammy? I mean, isn't he just kind of a harmless PR flack? A photogenic Titanic captain? You would think so. Unless the bank guys and the government guys are battling for dominance. The bankers held the reigns for so long, perhaps the Feds smell fear with the derivative bubble popping and are trying to get on top power wise. So, if Price Of Darkness Obammy is a banker butt buddy then the CIA would like to bump him off. My best guess is if the flu gets serious it was man made, meant to keep us powerless as the economy contracts and the oil runs out. If it turns out to be less than serious, it was a CIA attack on the banker cartel. Okay, it is all just being pulled out of my butt as I go along. But it sure is fun speculating. Out of time, but not out of paranoia.
END
Buy my crap www.bisonpress.com . I didn't add a link, but if you start at my Amazon page and click on any product, then search under Tools And Home Improvement you can find flu masks under "3M 8000 Particle Respirator N95, 30 pack", I'll get a commission on the sale.
I had an economic article all ready, and surprisingly it wasn't even really about the current collapse. I was going to explore the idea that the last thirty years were little more than digitalizing our old analog economy as the bulk of our production. For instance, military spending and advancement mostly being chipping everything and decentralizing communications. Or the replacement of people with "robots". Perhaps I'll still do that next week. No, it doesn't have a lot to do with preps other than understanding economics. Well, a loyal minion wrote and suggested an Obammy attack and it kind of got sucked into my brain and wouldn't leave. This falls under the mostly improbable but wouldn't it be cool if it were true category. And, no, this has almost nothing to do with preps either, other than relating to politics. At least it is a little something different.
*
You know, I know and Ross Perot knows that the official version of the JFK assassination has more huge gaping holes in it than a prison bitch. Oliver Stone's movie was a bit of disinformation, trying to deflect attention from the true culprits by blaming the military industrial complex because of a threat to the slow down in the Vietnam war. This makes absolutely no sense because the Cold War spending was sufficient to satisfy that group. Vietnam was just gravy, and even the greediest would agree you can't prolong a hot war too long or you damage the economy which kills military spending altogether. No, the real culprits were the Federal Reserve Bank ( in my humble opinion, anyway ). However, the movie did do a great job pointing out the many flaws in the official explanation. The Magic Bullet Theory. We will never know the details. We don't know if the CIA was involved because of the Bay Of Pigs. Or if the mafia was involved because of voting fraud. Hell, I'm sure Marilyn Monroe was involved somehow or another. Those details are not s important as who benefited the most. That is why my vote is with the central bank. JFK had tried to get back control of currency issuance. Tens of billions of dollars a year ( now hundreds ) in interest payments on the national debt is a powerful incentive to do away with anyone threatening that payment.
*
The new theory is that while before the CIA was ridding itself of the JFK threat, today it is concerned with the threat of exposure over the waterboarding torture issue. Obammy gets uppity over that, goes to Mexico on a "I'm a pretty boy and must tour the world calming fears that we are all going to die" visit, and the aerosol Swine Flu is sprayed around trying to infect him. Sure, it sounds crazy and convoluted, but remember that the CIA tried to get Fidel with an exploding cigar. Other times they tried to get his beard to fall out. And we wonder why the Bay Of Pigs didn't work. It isn't any crazier of a theory than any other. If you were the director of a huge intelligence service and were suddenly faced with prison time of position loss, is it so crazy to assume you wouldn't use your wet operatives to neutralize the threat? The KGB made "heart attacks" happen all the time to Premiers.
*
You might think that the CIA is little more than a large inefficient bureaucracy. And mostly you might be correct. But surely, throwing hundreds of billions at the problem might get some results. Plus, let's not forget most folks seem to think the drug trade is used by the CIA for off the books budget money. The untraced cash they have access to surely funds a lot of activity we don't know about. Who else could have infiltrated all of the militia groups in the '90's? I don't think the FBI had the manpower, being more of a quality than a quantity organization. The President makes noises about budget cutting at the end of the Cold War, but if all along they had an illegal undercover operation than they would have felt no danger of obsolescence. And what if it was the CIA rather than the ATF behind the OKC bombing? That sounds a lot more plausible to me than any other group.
*
So, any other reason the CIA would try to off Obammy? I mean, isn't he just kind of a harmless PR flack? A photogenic Titanic captain? You would think so. Unless the bank guys and the government guys are battling for dominance. The bankers held the reigns for so long, perhaps the Feds smell fear with the derivative bubble popping and are trying to get on top power wise. So, if Price Of Darkness Obammy is a banker butt buddy then the CIA would like to bump him off. My best guess is if the flu gets serious it was man made, meant to keep us powerless as the economy contracts and the oil runs out. If it turns out to be less than serious, it was a CIA attack on the banker cartel. Okay, it is all just being pulled out of my butt as I go along. But it sure is fun speculating. Out of time, but not out of paranoia.
END
Buy my crap www.bisonpress.com . I didn't add a link, but if you start at my Amazon page and click on any product, then search under Tools And Home Improvement you can find flu masks under "3M 8000 Particle Respirator N95, 30 pack", I'll get a commission on the sale.
